•

Spain are clear #1 because they combine perfect results with real output: 7 matches, 7W-0D-0L, and 15 goals. That gives them a strong 2.14 frequency and the top 71.07 rating. It reads like “dominance + consistency,” which is exactly what your team model rewards most.

•

England at #2 show that your rating isn’t just about wins or goals. They have only 3 wins in 7 matches (with 3 draws), and just 8 goals (frequency 1.14)—yet they still land at 69.19. That suggests your system heavily values surviving rounds and stable performance across many games.

•

The most “interesting” contrast is **France vs **Germany. France rank #3 with 6 matches and only 4 goals (frequency 0.67) but still score 68.46—a classic “tight-game, low-output, still-effective” profile. Germany at #4 are the opposite: 11 goals in 5 (frequency 2.20) but a lower 66.86 rating.

•

#5–#8 is basically a “balanced contenders” block. **Netherlands (#5) have 10 goals in 6 (1.67 frequency), while **Portugal (#6) are lower-output (5 goals in 5, 1.00 frequency) but still close on rating. Then **Turkey (#7) and **Switzerland (#8) show two paths: Turkey’s higher variance (3W/2L) vs Switzerland’s unbeaten stability (2W/3D/0L).

•

The lower half shows how fast ratings compress when goal output drops. **Belgium (#9) have just 2 goals in 4 (0.50 frequency), and **Slovenia (#10) are the extreme “draw machine”: 0 wins, 4 draws, only 2 goals, yet still 61.87. Meanwhile **Austria (#11) pop with 7 goals in 4 (1.75 frequency) but don’t climb higher—suggesting losses hurt more than goal spikes help at this tier.